Wednesday November 12th 2014
Last month In Delhi India, His Holiness
the Dalai Lama convened a meeting of the leaders of nine spiritual traditions
which are practiced in India. A written
note by the Dalai Lama was given to each spiritual leader and their followers,
the note expressing ‘The Delhi Declaration’, what the Dalai Lama hoped would be
achieved for further discussion in our contemporary world.
“Followers of all spiritual traditions try in their own ways to overcome
the suffering that afflicts beings in the world and to bring about their
happiness. However, it would be better if we worked together to fulfill such
aspirations.”
On the agenda of the two day meeting,
where spiritual leaders worked together with ‘a congregation of their flock’,
were pressing issues to our contemporary world, most pressing to the
International and Australian governments - counteracting violence committed in
the name of religion. We would only have
to read the pages of a newspaper such as this, to consider the threat that the
Islamic State poses to peace in our contemporary world.
I feel a pertinent question that should be asked
is - how could this group of ‘spiritual folk’ in a far off land like India,
give hope for resolution of this conflict with Islamic State a radical branch
of one world faith?
Of course it is not up to such spiritual leaders
to settle political conflict, that unenviable task rests with our national political
leaders, governments and our representatives in the United Nations. However the power of prayer and religious
dialogue, should neither be shunned as esoteric and being of no value to offering
inspiration in the resolution of world conflicts.
What can leaders of religion offer their
political representatives as hope in a time of crisis? One delegate can give some insight to ‘The
Delhi Declaration’, who thanked the Dalai Lama for entitling the conference “A
Meeting of Diverse Spiritual Traditions of India” rather than “Religious”
traditions. What is the pertinence of
the distinction in contemporary times between spiritual and religious
traditions?
I recall one of my Tibetan Buddhist teachers,
Traleg Rinpoche giving a lecture in New York, where he addressed the topic,
‘Reading Ancient Scriptures with a Modern Mind’.
Here Traleg Rinpoche expressed the belief that
in modern times readers of ancient texts like the bible, the Buddhist dharma or
other religious texts of law - should relate to the commonality of ascetic
practice. As Traleg Rinpoche alluded to,
the ascetics who wrote our religious doctrine used their common spiritual
experiences as inspiration for their religious oral words that came before the words
of religions were written.
One should take heart in this spiritual commonality,
rather than using religious doctrine as the word that sets religious radicals
against the hand of the National and International laws, which are currently
attempting to maintain peace on our planet.
Also present at last month’s ‘The Delhi
Declaration’ was the head of the Kagyu School, the teaching lineage of Tibetan
Buddhism, the Karmapa who made this relevant comment,
“We have been talking about the difference
between religion and spirituality. I
think all religions began from spirituality, because those who became founders
did not just have philosophical views, but they had experiences: actual, lived
experiences. I think we need to pay more attention to experience.”
As a Tibetan Buddhist practitioner of twenty four years, the Karmapa’s prophetic words resonate with the flavor of
Tibetan Buddhist teachings. For those of other faiths who are unfamiliar with
Tibetan Buddhism, I mean to say by this, is that the Karmapa’s comment infers
that in life we must concentrate on our experiences that lead us from political
samskaric life, a life where people of different philosophies have conflicts
which lead to war, into a unified peaceful world like that aimed for by the
contributors in last month’s ‘The Delhi Declaration’.
I recall the picture of Prime Minister Tony
Abbott standing on the tarmac, conveying his best wishes and intentions to our
fighter pilots before they left on a tour of duty. I honour the responsibility that our Prime
Minister and our service people have with the IS epidemic in Iraq and Syria,
and those of our security forces on home shores who must stop those recruited
from our own citizenship to defend IS overseas.
I’m sure our international leaders are like our
Catholic Prime Minister, in a quiet moment, sending prayers of their own faith
for our soldiers to come home and our misguided minority of Islamic citizens
from not entering foreign conflict.
The Dalai Lama made the statement, “Some
historians say that 200 million people were killed in the 20th century as a
result of wars and violence. The 21st century must become the century of
peace.”
Taking this statement as the ethos of ‘The
Delhi Declaration’ to Canberra, where unlike the Indian government the IS
threat isn’t on their own shores, like recruited insurgents are on own shores,
I have hope and sincere belief that, like the Dalai Lama says, this will be our
century of peace.
I recall an anecdote from India with an
Australian story, a train ride through India in the late 1990’s, which became
known as ‘The Peace Train.’ A train ride
of Indian spiritual/religious leaders, in the name of the freedom of practicing
faith, inspired after an Australian missionary husband and wife, were killed by
Hindu extremists because they fed their Christian converts meat, an action considered
against Hindu fundamentalists. I still send
prayers to the family of this couple.
Yet in these times where troubles permeate,
at still the foundation moments of our 21st century, I believe we
must consider the sentiments of ‘The Delhi Declaration’ for the future of our
world, my belief inspired by His Holiness the Dalai Lama, that we are entering
an age, where all world faiths will live in harmony together.
I Imagine on ‘A Canberra Declaration’
where our spiritual leaders and people of all world faiths draw together, in
the name of our free way of life, which our government is doing the best it can
in International diplomatic and military partnership, to defend and protect.
No comments:
Post a Comment